<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Heymans.org &#187; dependencies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://heymans.org/tag/dependencies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://heymans.org</link>
	<description>I&#039;m Bert Heymans, a project manager, moonlighting hobby photographer and an all-round tech adventurer.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 15:55:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Assumptions vs. Dependencies</title>
		<link>http://heymans.org/2009/01/assumptions-vs-dependencies/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=assumptions-vs-dependencies</link>
		<comments>http://heymans.org/2009/01/assumptions-vs-dependencies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 22:21:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[assumptions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dependencies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lessons learned]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[writing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://heymans.org/?p=132</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Words have the incredible power to set the trend in a business agreement, nothing new there, but at times differences can get subtle. That&#8217;s the case with using &#8220;assumptions&#8221; vs. using &#8220;dependencies&#8221;, they can mean the same thing but give a different message in the same context. There will always be things that are unknown [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Words have the incredible power to set the trend in a business agreement, nothing new there, but at times differences can get subtle. That&#8217;s the case with using <em>&#8220;assumptions&#8221;</em> vs. using <em>&#8220;dependencies&#8221;</em>, they can mean the same thing but give a different message in the same context.</p>
<p>There will always be things that are <strong>unknown</strong> in a <strong>projects life cycle</strong>. Now, when do you use which word?</p>
<ul>
<li>Filling in those particular blanks is critical for the success of the project? Then <strong>go for dependencies</strong>, reducing ambiguity on showstoppers is always good.</li>
<li>Need to make one choice over another to keep the story in the document intelligent, then <strong>you&#8217;re safe with assumptions</strong>.</li>
</ul>
<p><img src="http://heymans.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/2065691347_010d237042-222x300.jpg" alt="Make the right choice, you don&#039;t have to guess" title="Make the right choice, you don&#039;t have to guess" width="222" height="300" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-148" /></p>
<p><em>Assumptions</em> tend to take care of the unknown but <em>dependencies</em> imply someone <em>will need</em> to take responsibility for them.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a choice that keeps coming back in <a href="http://heymans.org/2009/01/shorter-project-charters/">project charters</a>, proposal texts and product case descriptions.</p>
<p><em>edit: </em>The thing is that those terms get used as topic headlines a lot in standard PM templates, and sometimes when arguments arise it’s a lot easier to point to dependencies than to assumptions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://heymans.org/2009/01/assumptions-vs-dependencies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

